Critical access hospitals face denials of Medicare payment
WSHA has been in contact with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding a widespread system issue disrupting Medicare payment to critical access hospitals throughout the country, including many CAHs in Washington State. The issue affects professional services billed on hospital institution claims through Method II billing. CMS is still gathering information identifying all of the issues that are causing payment denials, including but not limited to issues with provider enrollment. We encourage CAHs experiencing payment issues to reach out to CMS directly at[email protected]. (Jacqueline Barton True, [email protected].)
WSHA and AWPHD report 2025 lobbying expenses for Medicare cost reports
The Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual requires hospitals to adjust their Medicare cost reports to eliminate the portion of association dues related to lobbying expenses. Please forward this information to the people in your organization responsible for completing and submitting Medicare cost reports.
The Washington State Hospital Association (WSHA) has determined 26.5 percent of its membership dues were expended in activities that meet the Medicare definition of lobbying for calendar year 2025. For entities that must separately calculate federal lobbying expenditures, 3.2 percent of WSHA membership dues for 2025 were related to federal lobbying expenditures.
For the Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts (AWPHD), 8 percent of its membership dues were expended in activities that meet the Medicare definition of lobbying for calendar year 2025.
If you have questions, please contact Andrew Busz at [email protected]
OIC extends BBPA dispute resolution process until 2028
The Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC) announced it will be extending the dispute resolution process under the state’s Balance Billing Protection Act (BBPA) for at least two additional years and will revisit the issue in 2028. Reasons cited by OIC for the extension included comments received on OIC’s request for information, the continued high volume of cases in the NSA IDR process, pending federal litigation related to the NSA IDR process, pending civil litigation related to the misuse of the federal NSA IDR system; and the volume of claims introduced by private equity-backed provider groups. WSHA submitted comments supporting extension of the BBPA process given the federal challenges.
The state’s BBPA dispute resolution process applies to state-regulated carriers (individual and small group) as well as self-funded groups that have elected to participate in the BBPA. The BBPA process also applies to ground ambulance and certain emergency behavioral health services that are not included under the federal No Surprises Act. For claims that are subject to both the BBPA and the NSA, a facility or provider can use either dispute resolution process. More information is on the OIC Website. (Andrew Busz, [email protected].)
|